EGFR 타이로신키나제 저해제
EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors
The comparison question
The gefitinib–erlotinib example compares halogens and a carbon triple bond. The osimertinib entry separately compares the unsaturated C(=O)–N connection. Grouping the molecules in one class does not establish identical rings and connectivity.
Read the two structures
Locate ring nitrogens in gefitinib and erlotinib, then compare the substituents outside the rings. Check halogen labels and side-chain differences using both formula and drawing. A shared local motif does not establish identity of the whole molecule.
| Observation | Gefitinib | Erlotinib |
|---|---|---|
| Carbon triple bond C≡C | 0 | 1 |
| Fluorine atoms | 1 | 0 |
| Chlorine atoms | 1 | 0 |
Connect the structural observations with the fingerprint result
Gefitinib has one highlighted fluorine and one chlorine. Erlotinib has neither of these query matches and instead has one carbon triple-bond C≡C match. Read the coloured regions with the counts to distinguish the selected substituents concretely. [Gefitinib] · [Erlotinib]
There are 31 shared set bits across a union of 76, giving 0.408. The selected substituents differ while other encoded environments overlap. This is a whole-structure fingerprint calculation, not a score comparing only halogens and the triple bond.
Visual resemblance is a useful observation, but this calculation neither computes a maximum common substructure nor establishes an identical scaffold. Fingerprint overlap and a shared-scaffold claim require different evidence.
Calculated structural similarity: 0.408 · Morgan radius 2 / 2048 bits · Tanimoto
Calculation: 31 / (60 + 47 − 31) = 31 / 76 ≈ 0.408. Set-bit counts are not counts of unique atoms or functional groups.
Query definitions and reproducibility
- Carbon triple bond C≡C:
C#C - Fluorine atoms:
[F] - Chlorine atoms:
[Cl]
RDKit 2025.03.4 · Matches with identical atom sets are counted once. Colours mark atoms and bonds matching selected queries, not a proven shared scaffold or synthesis route.
- Read elemental composition from the formulas.
- Trace ring and substituent connections in each drawing.
- Compare your observations with the fingerprint score calculated under identical settings.
- Check stereochemistry and the complete InChIKey in the source records.
The score is fingerprint overlap, not a percentage of efficacy or safety. RDKit
Structure-source check: 2026-10-08 / 2026-10-08 · Editorial update and calculation check: 2026-10-16
Download source structures, queries and bit counts for this comparison (JSON)
Structure families
Key drugs · payloads
Comparisons · briefs
BioMoa
Editorial responsibility and corrections
Operated and edited by the independent StructureMoa project. Explanations use AI assistance; structural identity and similarity are checked against source records and calculation tests. Molecular data and clinical or regulatory evidence have separate review scopes.
- Source structures
- PubChem · CID / SMILES / InChIKey
- Calculations and automated checks
- RDKit · Morgan / SMARTS
- Disclosed specialist review
- No separate external specialist review is disclosed. Passing automated tests is not specialist review of clinical claims.
For a correction, include the page URL, molecule name or CID, the field in question and a supporting source. Corrections are checked against sources, and the affected editorial update date is changed when a correction is published. [email protected]