Molecular structure from independently sourced SMILES

Palbociclib 2D structure

Role
Drug
Mechanism class
CDK4/6 inhibitor
Aliases
ibrance
InChIKey
AHJRHEGDXFFMBM-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Structure checked
2026-10-08
Molecular formula
C24H29N7O2
Structure source
PubChem
PubChem CID
5330286
InChI Key
AHJRHEGDXFFMBM-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Read the two structures

Separate nitrogen-labelled rings from side chains in palbociclib and ribociclib, and trace their attachments. Compare connections between rings and external substituents together rather than judging a single ring. This gives context for shared and different fingerprint features.

C(=O)–N connectionsAromatic nitrogen atoms
Differences measured by the selected structure queries
ObservationPalbociclibRibociclib
C(=O)–N connections11
Aromatic nitrogen atoms44

Connect the structural observations with the fingerprint result

Each molecule has one selected C(=O)–N connection and four aromatic nitrogen matches. These two counts alone can hide differences. Ring arrangement and substituent attachment positions must still be compared independently. [Palbociclib] · [Ribociclib]

The fingerprints share 46 set bits across a union of 76, giving 0.605. This is greater overlap than in several other example pairs here, but not molecular identity. Equal selected motif counts can coexist with different local environments across the complete fingerprint.

Aromatic nitrogen count is not total nitrogen count. It includes atoms matching [n] and excludes aliphatic amine nitrogens. Keeping the query definition fixed makes the numbers comparable.

Calculated structural similarity: 0.605 · Morgan radius 2 / 2048 bits · Tanimoto

Calculation: 46 / (62 + 60 − 46) = 46 / 76 ≈ 0.605. Set-bit counts are not counts of unique atoms or functional groups.

Query definitions and reproducibility
  • C(=O)–N connections: [#6](=[#8])[#7]
  • Aromatic nitrogen atoms: [n]

RDKit 2025.03.4 · Matches with identical atom sets are counted once. Colours mark atoms and bonds matching selected queries, not a proven shared scaffold or synthesis route.

  1. Read elemental composition from the formulas.
  2. Trace ring and substituent connections in each drawing.
  3. Compare your observations with the fingerprint score calculated under identical settings.
  4. Check stereochemistry and the complete InChIKey in the source records.

The score is fingerprint overlap, not a percentage of efficacy or safety. RDKit

Structure-source check: 2026-10-08 / 2026-10-08 · Editorial update and calculation check: 2026-10-16

Download source structures, queries and bit counts for this comparison (JSON)

StructureMoa editorial · source review 2026-10-08

Molecular identity

Palbociclib: independently retrieved PubChem CID 5330286, formula C24H29N7O2.

How to compare

Separate nitrogen-labelled rings from side chains in palbociclib and ribociclib, and trace their attachments. Compare connections between rings and external substituents together rather than judging a single ring. This gives context for shared and different fingerprint features.

Interpretation limits

The Morgan/Tanimoto score measures fingerprint overlap. It does not establish efficacy, safety, clinical superiority or full stereochemical identity.

SMILES

CC1=C(C(=O)N(C2=NC(=NC=C12)NC3=NC=C(C=C3)N4CCNCC4)C5CCCC5)C(=O)C

Tags

CDK4/6

Related compounds

External IDs · BioMoa

StructureMoa is a chemical-structure exploration tool. Structural similarity, clustering, and SAR relationships are intended for research exploration and do not establish shared potency, selectivity, safety, efficacy, or clinical performance.

Editorial responsibility and corrections

Operated and edited by the independent StructureMoa project. Explanations use AI assistance; structural identity and similarity are checked against source records and calculation tests. Molecular data and clinical or regulatory evidence have separate review scopes.

Source structures
PubChem · CID / SMILES / InChIKey
Calculations and automated checks
RDKit · Morgan / SMARTS
Disclosed specialist review
No separate external specialist review is disclosed. Passing automated tests is not specialist review of clinical claims.

For a correction, include the page URL, molecule name or CID, the field in question and a supporting source. Corrections are checked against sources, and the affected editorial update date is changed when a correction is published. [email protected]