구조모아 (StructureMoa)항암 chemical structure spider web
방문타깃 · 모달리티 · 임상 근거 · 비임상 맥락으로 최대 5개 프로그램을 나란히 비교합니다. · 다음 갱신 D-5 · 마지막 9월 2일
현재 선택: 1개 · 임상 갱신 필요 1개
프로그램 상세에서 관심 등록 후 2개 이상 모으면 여기서 한 번에 비교할 수 있습니다.
표가 넓으면 좌우로 스크롤하세요. 핵심 비교 모드에서는 중요 항목만 표시됩니다.
| 항목 | |
|---|---|
Overview Program | Denosumab |
Overview Company | Amgen |
Overview Modality | ANTIBODY |
Overview Target | Giant Cell Tumor of Bone |
Overview Indication | Postmenopausal Osteoporosis |
Overview Phase | PHASE_3 |
Overview Status | ACTIVE |
Overview Content status | Limited Data |
Overview Data Confidence | Data Confidence · Low |
Overview Development Signal | Development Signal · Emerging |
Overview Approval status | Investigational |
MoA Mechanism | targeting RANKL (denosumab), pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-17 inhibitors), and Wnt pathway |
MoA Biomarker | Biomarkers, and Emerging Therapies |
PK/PD Half-life | 25.4 h |
PK/PD Species | Mouse, Rat, Rabbit |
PK/PD Animal (cat.) | Mouse, Rat, In vitro |
PK/PD Experiment | PD |
Toxicology Species | Mouse, Rat, Rabbit |
Toxicology Animal (cat.) | Rat, In vitro |
Toxicology Major finding | Cardiovascular Outcomes Associated with Romosozumab Versus Denosumab in Chronic Kidney Disease.. Background and Objective: Romosozumab carries a warning for potential severe cardiovascular events, while denosumab is widely used for osteoporosis but requires safety considerations in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). Given the limited direct real-world evidence comparing these treatments, in th… |
Clinical Safety signal | Cardiovascular Outcomes Associated with Romosozumab Versus Denosumab in Chronic Kidney Disease.. Background and Objective: Romosozumab carries a warning for potential severe cardiovascular events, while denosumab is widely used for osteoporosis but requires safety considerations in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). Given the limited direct real-world evidence comparing these treatments, in th… |
Clinical Selected reported efficacy | ORR 81.9% |
Clinical Reported ORR | 81.9% |
Clinical Result source | ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01920568 |
Clinical Program phase | PHASE_3 |
Clinical Trial activity | No active/completed counts |
Clinical Trial ref | NCT01920568 |
타깃 · 모달리티 · 임상 근거 · 비임상 맥락으로 최대 5개 프로그램을 나란히 비교합니다. · 다음 갱신 D-5 · 마지막 9월 2일
현재 선택: 1개 · 임상 갱신 필요 1개
프로그램 상세에서 관심 등록 후 2개 이상 모으면 여기서 한 번에 비교할 수 있습니다.
표가 넓으면 좌우로 스크롤하세요. 핵심 비교 모드에서는 중요 항목만 표시됩니다.
| 항목 | |
|---|---|
Overview Program | Denosumab |
Overview Company | Amgen |
Overview Modality | ANTIBODY |
Overview Target | Giant Cell Tumor of Bone |
Overview Indication | Postmenopausal Osteoporosis |
Overview Phase | PHASE_3 |
Overview Status | ACTIVE |
Overview Content status | Limited Data |
Overview Data Confidence | Data Confidence · Low |
Overview Development Signal | Development Signal · Emerging |
Overview Approval status | Investigational |
MoA Mechanism | targeting RANKL (denosumab), pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-17 inhibitors), and Wnt pathway |
MoA Biomarker | Biomarkers, and Emerging Therapies |
PK/PD Half-life | 25.4 h |
PK/PD Species | Mouse, Rat, Rabbit |
PK/PD Animal (cat.) | Mouse, Rat, In vitro |
PK/PD Experiment | PD |
Toxicology Species | Mouse, Rat, Rabbit |
Toxicology Animal (cat.) | Rat, In vitro |
Toxicology Major finding | Cardiovascular Outcomes Associated with Romosozumab Versus Denosumab in Chronic Kidney Disease.. Background and Objective: Romosozumab carries a warning for potential severe cardiovascular events, while denosumab is widely used for osteoporosis but requires safety considerations in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). Given the limited direct real-world evidence comparing these treatments, in th… |
Clinical Safety signal | Cardiovascular Outcomes Associated with Romosozumab Versus Denosumab in Chronic Kidney Disease.. Background and Objective: Romosozumab carries a warning for potential severe cardiovascular events, while denosumab is widely used for osteoporosis but requires safety considerations in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). Given the limited direct real-world evidence comparing these treatments, in th… |
Clinical Selected reported efficacy | ORR 81.9% |
Clinical Reported ORR | 81.9% |
Clinical Result source | ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01920568 |
Clinical Program phase | PHASE_3 |
Clinical Trial activity | No active/completed counts |
Clinical Trial ref | NCT01920568 |
추천 비교
추천 비교